As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. For more practice problems like this, see Schaum’s Outline of College Physics, 12th Edition.

1. What the question is really asking

The student has read the Lee–Yang (or Lee–Yang–Fisher) theorem, which tells us that for a system in the thermodynamic limit the zeros of the grand‑canonical (or canonical) partition function in the complex plane of a control parameter (fugacity, magnetic field, etc.) condense onto curves (or surfaces).
When one of those curves touches the real axis the free‑energy becomes non‑analytic and a phase transition occurs.

The student now wonders:

  • A triple point is a point in a real‑parameter phase diagram where three different phases (e.g., solid, liquid, gas) coexist.
  • Along the real axis we seem to have only two “sides’’ of a zero‑line (the line can be crossed from the left or from the right), so how can three different phases be distinguished?
  • In other words: Can the Lee–Yang picture accommodate a triple point, and how do the complex‑plane domains of analyticity map onto the familiar phase‑diagram regions?

Below is a step‑by‑step answer that clarifies the relationship between Lee–Yang zeros, domains of analyticity, and the triple point.

2. Detailed answer (step‑by‑step)

Step 1 – Write down the relevant partition function

For a single‑component fluid we work in the grand‑canonical ensemble

[ \Xi(T,\mu,V)=\sum_{N=0}^{\infty} z^{N}\,Z_{N}(T,V), \qquad z\equiv e^{\beta\mu} ]

where

  • (T) – temperature,
  • (\mu) – chemical potential,
  • (V) – volume,
  • (z) – fugacity (complex variable when we discuss zeros),
  • (\beta=1/k_{B}T).

The grand potential is

[ \Omega(T,\mu,V) = -k_{B}T\ln\Xi . ]

All thermodynamic observables are derivatives of (\Omega).

Step 2 – Lee–Yang zeros in the thermodynamic limit

For any finite (V) the function (\Xi(z)) is a polynomial in (z); its zeros ({z_{j}(V)}) are isolated points in the complex‑(z) plane.
Define the zero density

[ \rho_{V}(z)=\frac{1}{V}\sum_{j}\delta^{(2)}(z-z_{j}(V)). ]

When (V\to\infty) the zeros condense onto one‑dimensional manifolds (\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}) (curves) or, more generally, onto surfaces in a multi‑parameter space.

A classic result (Lee–Yang theorem for ferromagnets, Fisher zeros for temperature) is

[ \lim_{V\to\infty}\frac{1}{V}\ln\Xi(z)=\begin{cases} \displaystyle f_{1}(z) & \text{if }z\text{ lies in domain }D_{1},\[4pt] \displaystyle f_{2}(z) & \text{if }z\text{ lies in domain }D_{2},
\vdots \end{cases} ]

where each (f_{\alpha}(z)) is an analytic function in its own domain (D_{\alpha}).
The boundaries (\partial D_{\alpha}) are precisely the curves (\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}) formed by the accumulation of zeros.

Inside a given domain the system is in a single pure phase (the analytic branch that dominates the thermodynamic limit).

Step 3 – How many “sides’’ can a curve have?

In the real‑parameter plane (e.g. real (z) = real fugacity) a given curve (\mathcal{C}) may intersect the axis at isolated points ({z_{c}^{(k)}}).

When we look only on the real axis, we indeed see two sides of a single curve (left and right).
However, the complex‑plane picture is richer:

  • Different curves (\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}) can meet at the same real point.
  • The point where three curves intersect is a branch point of the logarithm of (\Xi).
  • Approaching that point from different angular sectors of the complex plane selects different analytic branches (f_{\alpha}(z)).

Thus a real number (z_{0}) can be a limit point of more than two analytic continuations, even though on the real line it looks like a simple crossing of a single curve.

Step 4 – Triple point as a multiple accumulation point

Consider three pure phases: solid (S), liquid (L) and gas (G).
For a given temperature (T_{tp}) and pressure (p_{tp}) the three phases have identical grand potentials:

[ \Omega_{S}(T_{tp},\mu_{tp})= \Omega_{L}(T_{tp},\mu_{tp})= \Omega_{G}(T_{tp},\mu_{tp}) . ]

In the fugacity language this means that three analytic branches of (\frac{1}{V}\ln\Xi(z)) meet at the same real value

[ z_{tp}=e^{\beta\mu_{tp}} . ]

In the complex (z)–plane the zero‑density curves (\mathcal{C}{SL},\;\mathcal{C}{LG},\;\mathcal{C}{GS}) (each separating a pair of phases) converge to the single point (z{tp}).

Graphically:

          Im z
            |
   (SL)   /   \   (GS)
          \   /
           \ /
            •  z = z_tp   (real axis)
           / \
          /   \
   (LG) /     \ (LG)
  • The three sectors between the curves correspond to the three distinct pure phases.
  • Crossing any of the three curves changes the dominant branch of (\ln\Xi) and therefore the thermodynamic state.
  • The triple point is a multiple Lee–Yang zero accumulation point, not a simple single‑curve intersection.

Mathematically one can show that near a point where (m) curves meet, the singular part of the free energy behaves like

[ f(z) \; \sim\; \sum_{k=1}^{m} a_{k}\, (z-z_{tp})^{\alpha_{k}}, ]

with branch‑cut angles that sum to (2\pi). For (m=3) the three angles are each (2\pi/3) in the simplest symmetric case, but any set of angles that adds up to (2\pi) is allowed (they are fixed by the underlying microscopic model).

Step 5 – Mapping complex‑plane domains to the usual phase diagram

A conventional phase diagram is drawn in the real plane of two intensive variables, e.g. ((T,p)) or ((T,\mu)).

Each point ((T,\mu)) defines a real value of the fugacity (z=e^{\beta\mu}).
For that fixed temperature we can look at the complex‑(z) plane:

Region in complex (z) Physical meaning (at that (T))
Domain (D_{S}) (bounded by curves (\mathcal{C}{SL}) and (\mathcal{C}{GS})) System is in the solid phase.
Domain (D_{L}) (bounded by (\mathcal{C}{SL}) and (\mathcal{C}{LG})) Liquid phase.
Domain (D_{G}) (bounded by (\mathcal{C}{LG}) and (\mathcal{C}{GS})) Gas phase.
On any curve (\mathcal{C}_{\alpha\beta}) Coexistence of the two phases (\alpha) and (\beta) (first‑order transition).
At the triple‑point intersection (z_{tp}) Coexistence of all three phases (the meeting of three curves).

When the temperature is varied, the whole set of curves ({\mathcal{C}{\alpha\beta}(T)}) moves in the complex plane. The locus of their real‑axis intersections as a function of (T) reproduces the familiar coexistence lines (e.g. the liquid–gas line). The special temperature where the three curves intersect the real axis at the *same* point is precisely the triple‑point temperature (T{tp}).

Thus the Lee–Yang picture does account for triple points; it simply does it in a higher‑dimensional (complex) parameter space where several zero‑curves can meet.

Step 6 – Summary of the logical chain

Logical step Reason
1. Zeros of (\Xi(z)) condense onto curves as (V\to\infty). Lee–Yang theorem.
2. Each curve separates two analytic domains (two pure phases). Analyticity of (\frac{1}{V}\ln\Xi).
3. Different pairs of phases have different curves. Distinct free‑energy branches.
4. At a point where three curves intersect, three domains meet. Multi‑branch point of the logarithm.
5. The real‑axis intersection of that point gives a real fugacity where three phases coexist → triple point. Equality of grand potentials.
6. Mapping back to ((T,\mu)) (or ((T,p))) reproduces the usual phase diagram. Thermodynamic identification.

3. Final answer

Yes. In the Lee–Yang (or Lee–Yang–Fisher) framework a triple point appears as a multiple accumulation point where three distinct curves of zeros of the grand‑canonical partition function meet the real axis simultaneously.

Each curve separates two analytic domains; the three curves together bound three domains, and the point of intersection corresponds to a value of the real control parameter (e.g. fugacity) at which the three analytic branches of the free energy are equal. This is precisely the condition for three phases to coexist, i.e. a triple point.

The correspondence between complex‑plane neighborhoods (the analytic domains) and the ordinary phase diagram is: every domain maps to a pure phase, every zero‑curve maps to a first‑order coexistence line, and a point where several curves intersect maps to a higher‑order coexistence point (triple point, critical endpoint, etc.).

4. Common mistakes when applying Lee–Yang zeros to triple points

Mistake Why it is wrong Correct viewpoint
“Only two sides of a zero line exist, so only two phases can meet.” This ignores the possibility that different zero lines can intersect at the same real point. Multiple curves can meet; each curve separates a different pair of phases.
Identifying the zero curve only on the real axis. The Lee–Yang theorem is about zeros in the complex plane; restricting to the real line loses information about how many analytic branches meet. Study the full complex‑parameter space; the geometry of curves determines the number of coexisting phases.
Confusing a zero with a pole. Zeros of (\Xi) give singularities of (\ln\Xi); poles would give regular behavior. Zeros → non‑analyticities → phase transitions.
Assuming all three coexistence lines have to intersect at exactly the same angle. The angles are model‑dependent; only the sum of the angular sectors must be (2\pi). The meeting point is a branch point; the local exponent (critical index) fixes the angles, not a universal “120°’’ rule.
     

Original question: Can Lee-Yang zeros theorem account for triple point phase transition? on Physics Stack Exchange, licensed CC BY-SA.